![]() With its dedicated tele lens offering a 50mm equivalent focal length, results were pretty good around a 2x zoom factor, despite some noticeable image noise. Our testers found zoom to be the area where the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has most potential for improvement. When moving while recording, video stabilization was not always effective, resulting in more noticeable camera shake than on the best-in-class devices. Temporal noise was well under control with fairly static scenes. Video footage offered accurate exposure and white balance, as well as acceptable levels of detail (albeit with some slight oversharpening). In video, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro ranks below the very best devices in its class, generally allowing the user to record high quality video clips in fairly static scenes. However, our testers observed some contrast issues in challenging high-contrast scenes, which could result in clipping and tone compression. The autofocus did its job swiftly and accurately in bright light, and the camera generally produced a good texture/noise trade-off. When shooting still images, subject exposure and white balance were nice in most test conditions, especially in low light and night shots. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro delivered a good performance across most areas of our image quality tests. Frequent fusion artifacts, hue shift effects around clipped areas.Unnatural contrast on faces in high-contrast scenes.Noise in bright light, especially in blue skies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |